🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," said the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.